Tuesday, 17 February 2026

Tributes Pour In for Civil Rights Activist Rev. Jesse Jackson: A Legacy That Reshaped American Politics

 




Tributes are pouring in from political leaders, clergy members, activists, and everyday Americans honoring the life and legacy of Jesse Jackson, one of the most influential civil rights figures of the last half-century.

As news spreads, social media platforms, churches, universities, and political institutions are reflecting on Jackson’s decades-long fight for racial equality, economic justice, voting rights, and global human rights.

His legacy is not just historical — it remains deeply connected to today’s political and social debates.


Who Was Rev. Jesse Jackson?

Rev. Jesse Jackson rose to national prominence during the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, working closely with Martin Luther King Jr.. After King’s assassination in 1968, Jackson emerged as a leading voice for justice, continuing the work of nonviolent activism and community empowerment.

In 1971, he founded Operation PUSH, which later merged into the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition. These organizations focused on economic empowerment, corporate accountability, education access, and political inclusion for marginalized communities.

Over time, Jackson became not only a civil rights activist but also a national political force.


Historic Presidential Campaigns That Changed the Political Landscape

In 1984 and 1988, Jackson made history by running for President of the United States, becoming one of the first African American candidates to mount serious nationwide campaigns.

His 1988 campaign, in particular, energized millions of voters and expanded political participation among minority communities, young voters, and progressive coalitions. His “Rainbow Coalition” strategy aimed to unite diverse groups — Black, Latino, working-class white voters, farmers, labor unions, and peace activists — under a shared vision of economic fairness and civil rights.

Many political analysts say Jackson’s campaigns helped pave the way for future leaders, including Barack Obama, whose historic 2008 victory marked a milestone many believe was influenced by the groundwork Jackson laid decades earlier.


National and Global Influence

Jackson’s influence extended beyond U.S. borders. Over the years, he participated in international diplomatic efforts, advocating for:

He often acted as an unofficial diplomat, leveraging relationships to negotiate humanitarian outcomes during international crises.


Tributes From Across the Political Spectrum

Public figures from both major political parties have acknowledged Jackson’s impact. Civil rights leaders credit him with keeping the movement alive during difficult political eras. Faith leaders emphasize his moral voice rooted in Christian ministry and social justice.

Younger activists say his message of coalition-building remains relevant in today’s climate of political polarization.

Common themes in tributes include:

Many describe him as a “bridge builder” who sought to unite communities rather than divide them.


A Complex but Powerful Legacy

Like many prominent leaders, Jackson’s career included moments of controversy. Critics occasionally questioned certain political strategies or statements. However, even many critics acknowledge the undeniable role he played in shaping modern American politics.

Over more than five decades, Jackson consistently addressed issues such as:

His influence can be seen in policy conversations that continue today.


Health Challenges and Later Years

In 2017, Jackson revealed that he had been diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease. In recent years, he stepped back from daily leadership roles but remained a symbolic and spiritual figure within the civil rights community.

Even as his public appearances became less frequent, his name remained synonymous with activism and moral leadership.


Why Jesse Jackson’s Legacy Still Matters Today

As debates over voting access, economic inequality, and racial justice continue, Jackson’s life work remains highly relevant. Many of the issues he championed — from voter registration drives to fair wages — remain central to today’s political discourse.

His “Rainbow Coalition” philosophy, focused on unity across racial and economic lines, is often referenced as a model for building inclusive political movements.


The Enduring Impact of a Civil Rights Icon

The wave of tributes pouring in reflects more than admiration — it represents recognition of a leader who transformed civic engagement in America.

Rev. Jesse Jackson helped expand who participates in democracy, who runs for office, and whose voices are heard in national debates. His legacy is etched into the fabric of American political history.

As the nation reflects on his contributions, one message echoes clearly: his fight for justice, dignity, and equality reshaped the American story — and its impact will be felt for generations to come.

Thursday, 12 February 2026

Dad Shot Daughter After ‘Arguing About Donald Trump,’ Inquest Hears

 

Tragic Shooting After Political Argument

A 23-year-old British woman was shot dead by her father in Prosper, Texas, after the two had a heated argument about Donald Trump, a coroner’s inquest has heard. The heartbreaking case — which stemmed from a family disagreement that escalated tragically — has drawn international attention and raised questions about gun safety and domestic conflict.


What the Inquest Heard

The inquest at Cheshire Coroner’s Court in the U.K. revealed that Lucy Harrison, a fashion buyer from Warrington, England, was visiting her father, Kris Harrison, in Texas in January 2025 when the fatal incident occurred. The court heard that Lucy and her father argued earlier in the day about U.S. President Donald Trump and gun ownership, which escalated tensions between them.

In testimony, Lucy’s boyfriend told the court that the argument became intense, with Lucy expressing distress about her father’s views. About half an hour before the couple were due to return to the U.K., Kris Harrison took Lucy by the hand and led her to a bedroom. Moments later, a loud bang was heard and Lucy was found lying on the floor with a gunshot wound to her chest.


Father’s Account: ‘Accidental’ Shooting

Kris Harrison — who previously battled alcohol addiction — told investigators he had been showing Lucy his Glock 9mm handgun from a bedside cabinet when the gun suddenly discharged. He claimed he did not know whether his finger was on the trigger and that he did not intend to fire the weapon. CCTV evidence presented at the inquest showed that he had consumed alcohol earlier that day.


Legal Outcomes: No Charges in U.S., Unlawful Killing in UK

While local authorities in Collin County, Texas investigated the shooting as a possible manslaughter case, a U.S. grand jury declined to indict Kris Harrison and he faced no criminal charges under Texas law.

However, the UK coroner concluded the killing was unlawful, describing the father’s actions as gross negligence manslaughter. The coroner noted that pointing a loaded firearm at a standing person and pulling the trigger — even if claimed accidental — met the legal threshold for unlawful killing under UK inquest standards.


Family and Loved Ones Remember Lucy

Lucy’s mother, Jane Coates, described her daughter as a “real force of life” who was passionate, empathetic and loved engaging in meaningful discussions. Friends and family alike have spoken about her kindness and vibrant personality, making the tragedy even more devastating.

Her boyfriend, who witnessed the aftermath, testified about the moments after the shooting, describing Kris Harrison as screaming incoherently for his wife. Emergency services were called, but Lucy was pronounced dead at the scene.


Broader Questions Raised by the Case

The case has sparked debate over issues including:

Gun violence advocates and critics of Texas gun laws have pointed to the incident as an example of how easily firearms can turn deadly within homes — even amid claimed accidental discharges.


Conclusion: A Tragic Outcome After a Heated Argument

The death of Lucy Harrison — shot dead by her father after an argument about Donald Trump — underscores how quickly family disputes can lead to irreversible tragedy. With contrasting legal findings on both sides of the Atlantic, her death continues to fuel conversation about gun safety, domestic disputes, and the lingering impact of political polarization on personal relationships.

Tuesday, 10 February 2026

ICE Chief, Immigration Officials Defend Mass Deportation Campaign at House Hearing




Contentious House Hearing Puts Immigration Policy in the Spotlight

Senior officials from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) faced sharp questioning during a House hearing as they defended the federal government’s mass deportation campaign, calling it a necessary response to rising immigration violations and national security concerns.

The hearing quickly became contentious, reflecting the deep political divide over immigration enforcement and the scope of ICE’s authority.


ICE Leadership Pushes Back on Criticism

The ICE chief and top immigration officials rejected claims that the deportation effort is indiscriminate or abusive, arguing instead that enforcement actions are lawful, targeted, and focused on public safety threats.

Officials emphasized that:

“We are enforcing the law as written by Congress,” one official told lawmakers, adding that ICE does not create immigration policy but carries out mandates set by elected officials.


Lawmakers Clash Over Due Process and Human Impact

Democratic lawmakers raised concerns about due process protections, family separations, and the humanitarian impact of large-scale deportations. Some cited reports of individuals being removed despite long-standing community ties or pending legal claims.

Republican members, however, defended ICE’s approach, arguing that failure to enforce immigration laws undermines the rule of law and incentivizes illegal entry.

“This is about accountability,” one lawmaker said. “No country can function without enforcing its borders.”


Officials Say Resources Are Stretched Thin

ICE representatives also highlighted resource constraints, noting that the agency is operating under intense pressure amid high caseloads and limited detention capacity. Officials warned that inconsistent policy signals from Congress make enforcement more difficult.

They called for:

  • Clearer legislative guidance

  • Increased funding for enforcement and immigration courts

  • Faster adjudication of asylum and removal cases


Broader Immigration Debate Intensifies

The hearing comes as immigration remains a top issue for voters, with mass deportation efforts drawing both strong support and fierce opposition nationwide. Advocacy groups staged protests outside the hearing, while border-state lawmakers urged continued enforcement.

Experts say the debate is unlikely to ease as Congress remains divided on comprehensive immigration reform.


What Happens Next

While no immediate policy changes emerged from the hearing, lawmakers signaled that additional oversight hearings and legislative proposals are likely in the coming weeks. ICE officials said enforcement operations will continue unless directed otherwise by Congress or the courts.

For now, the hearing underscored how immigration enforcement remains one of the most polarizing issues in American politics.

FBI Releases Surveillance Photos and Videos of Potential Subject in Nancy Guthrie Case



New Evidence Released as Investigation Escalates

The FBI has released surveillance photos and video footage of a person described as a potential subject in the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, signaling a major development in a case that has gripped national attention.

Federal authorities say the images are being shared to generate new leads and encourage anyone who recognizes the individual to come forward immediately.


What the FBI Is Asking the Public to Look For

According to investigators, the released footage shows an individual whose identity and movements are now considered relevant to the case. While officials have not labeled the person a suspect, they emphasize that identifying the individual could be critical to advancing the investigation.

The FBI is asking the public to focus on:

  • Physical appearance and clothing

  • Gait or distinctive mannerisms

  • Location and timing of the footage

  • Any prior interactions or sightings

Authorities stress that even partial recognition could help narrow down leads.


Why the FBI Is Releasing Surveillance Footage

Law enforcement experts note that releasing surveillance images typically indicates:

  • The investigation has reached a time-sensitive phase

  • Key leads require public assistance

  • Authorities believe someone in the community may recognize the subject

The move also suggests investigators are expanding their focus beyond traditional investigative channels.


Family Still Pleads for Answers

The case has drawn widespread attention following emotional public appeals from Savannah Guthrie, who previously described the situation as an “hour of desperation” for her family.

While officials have not commented on how the footage directly connects to Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance, they confirm the release is part of a broader strategy to uncover what happened and bring clarity to the case.


Authorities Urge Caution and Responsibility

The FBI and local law enforcement urge the public not to speculate or attempt to identify the individual publicly on social media. Misidentification, officials warn, can cause harm and slow the investigation.

Instead, anyone who believes they recognize the person in the footage is asked to contact the FBI directly through official tip lines. Anonymous tips are accepted.


How the Public Can Help Right Now

Investigators are asking anyone who:

  • Recognizes the person in the surveillance images

  • Was in the area around the time the footage was recorded

  • Has relevant security camera or dashcam footage

  • Received unusual communications

to contact federal or local authorities immediately.

Officials reiterate: no detail is too small.


A Critical Moment in the Case

The release of surveillance photos and video marks a significant turning point in the Nancy Guthrie investigation. As pressure mounts to find answers, authorities are relying on the public’s eyes and memory to help identify a key individual.

For Guthrie’s family, the hope remains that this step will lead to long-awaited clarity — and, ultimately, justice.





Tuesday, 6 January 2026

Jasmine Crockett Says ‘F--- You’ to the Supreme Court Over Texas Redistricting Decision

 




A Blunt Response to a Controversial Ruling

Texas Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett drew national attention after delivering a blunt and profane response to the Supreme Court’s decision on Texas redistricting, telling the high court “f--- you” during remarks criticizing the ruling.

Her statement quickly went viral, highlighting the deep frustration among some Democrats and voting rights advocates who argue the decision weakens protections for minority voters. Supporters praised her candor, while critics accused her of disrespecting the judiciary.


The Supreme Court’s Texas Redistricting Decision

The Supreme Court’s ruling effectively allowed Texas’ redistricting maps to stand, rejecting or declining to advance challenges that claimed the maps diluted minority voting power.

Supporters of the decision argue:

  • Redistricting is primarily a state issue

  • Courts should avoid excessive intervention

  • Legislatures have broad authority in map drawing

Opponents say the ruling:

The decision reignited long-running debates over the Court’s role in election law.


Crockett’s Reaction: Frustration Boils Over

Crockett, a former civil rights attorney, has consistently spoken out against what she views as voter suppression tactics. Her profane remark reflected intense frustration rather than a scripted political message.

“This is about real people losing their voices,” Crockett said in follow-up comments, arguing that the decision will have lasting consequences for Black and Latino voters in Texas.

Her defenders say the language underscored the emotional weight of the issue.


Supporters Applaud Her Candor

Many voting rights activists and progressive voters praised Crockett for saying what they believe others are thinking.

Supporters argue:

  • Strong language reflects genuine outrage

  • Polite rhetoric has failed to stop restrictive laws

  • Direct speech cuts through political noise

On social media, hashtags supporting Crockett trended as users defended her tone as honest and necessary.


Critics Call the Remarks Disrespectful

Republican lawmakers and some legal analysts criticized Crockett’s comments as inappropriate.

Critics argue:

  • The Supreme Court deserves institutional respect

  • Profanity undermines constructive debate

  • Elected officials should model civility

Some warned that such rhetoric could further erode public trust in democratic institutions.


A Broader Debate Over Judicial Power

The controversy surrounding Crockett’s statement taps into a larger national conversation about:

Recent rulings on voting rights, abortion, and administrative authority have intensified scrutiny of the Court from both sides of the political spectrum.


Texas Redistricting and Minority Voters

Texas remains one of the most closely watched states when it comes to redistricting battles.

Civil rights groups argue:

Crockett’s response reflects the urgency many advocates feel as future elections approach.







Political Impact and What Comes Next

While Crockett’s remark sparked backlash, it also elevated her profile nationally. Analysts say:

  • The moment may energize progressive voters

  • It could become a campaign talking point

  • It highlights stark differences in political communication styles

The redistricting debate itself is far from over, with potential legislative responses and future legal challenges still possible.


 A Flashpoint in the Voting Rights Debate

Jasmine Crockett’s profane rebuke of the Supreme Court over its Texas redistricting decision has become a flashpoint in the broader fight over voting rights and judicial authority. Whether viewed as courageous honesty or inappropriate rhetoric, her comments reflect the deep divisions surrounding election law in America.

As redistricting battles continue nationwide, emotions — and political stakes — are only likely to rise.

Tuesday, 30 December 2025

Missing Camila Mendoza Olmos: Dashcam Captures Last Sighting of Texas Teen Who Vanished Christmas Eve

 




Dashcam Shows Possible Last Sighting of Missing Texas Teen

Newly released dashcam footage may have captured the last known sighting of 19-year-old Camila Mendoza Olmos, a Texas teen who mysteriously disappeared on Christmas Eve from her San Antonio home — and authorities are urgently appealing for help as the search enters its fifth day. Law enforcement fears she may be in “imminent danger” as the investigation continues across local neighborhoods. 


What the Dashcam Footage Shows

The dashcam video — recorded by a neighbor driving to work around 7 a.m. on December 24 — shows a figure matched to Olmos’ description walking northbound on Wildhorse Parkway, close to Shetland Wind and Caspian Spring just a short distance from her home. Sheriff Javier Salazar said this clip is considered the most recent confirmed sighting of Camila before she vanished. 

Authorities have urged residents in that area to review their own surveillance video for anything that might help investigators piece together what happened. 


How She Disappeared: Unusual Circumstances

Camila Mendoza Olmos was last seen leaving her home around 6:58 a.m. on Christmas Eve. A separate security camera captured her looking inside her car, which she left behind when she disappeared. 

Her cell phone and iPad were left at home, and she took only her car keys and possibly her driver’s license — behavior her family says was unusual. Her mother told authorities that Camila would often go for morning walks but never without her phone, making this incident especially concerning. 


Authorities: She May Be in “Imminent Danger”

The Bexar County Sheriff’s Office has classified the case as a CLEAR Alert, indicating that Camila may be in imminent danger of bodily harm or death — a designation used when law enforcement believes a missing person could be at serious risk. 

Sheriff Salazar said that investigators are not ruling anything out, including scenarios such as:

  • Self-harm or mental health crisis,

  • Voluntary disappearance, or

  • Foul play, including possible abduction or human trafficking


Search Efforts: Local, Federal, and Community Involvement

Law enforcement is approaching the search from multiple angles:

  • Ground searches with deputies, cadaver dogs, and drones,

  • Neighborhood canvassing with flyers and volunteers,

  • FBI and Department of Homeland Security assistance, and

  • Monitoring of possible flight or border activity — although immigration authorities say she has not been taken into custody

A reward has even been offered by local organizations for credible information that leads to finding her. 


Family’s Perspective: Hope and Concern

Camila’s parents have been actively involved in the search, showing both worry and hope. Her mother, Rosario Olmos, initially thought Camila had just gone on a routine walk, as she often did, but realized something was wrong when she didn’t return. 

Her father and extended family have participated in community search efforts, distributing maps, coordinating volunteers, and appealing to the public via social media and local news. Many community members have joined the search — reflecting how much the case has resonated locally. 


What Camila Was Wearing and Physical Description

When she disappeared, Camila was described as:

  • 19 years old,

  • About 5’4″ tall,

  • Weighing around 110 pounds, and

  • Wearing a black and baby-blue hoodie, baby-blue pajama bottoms, and white shoes on the morning she vanished. 

These details have been circulated widely to help witnesses identify her in other footage or public sightings.


Camila Mendoza Olmos, 19, was last seen outside her home in San Antonio, Texas, on Christmas Eve, authorities said. (Bexar County Sheriff's Office)



Possible Leads and What Officials Are Asking For

Investigators are urging anyone who:

  • Lived in the Wildhorse Parkway vicinity,

  • Was driving through between 6:45–8:00 a.m. on Dec. 24, or

  • Captured dashcam or home surveillance that day

…to check their recordings and share them with authorities. Any new angles — even from a few streets away — could be critical to the investigation. 

Officials emphasize that even a brief clip or timestamp could help clarify her movements after she was last seen.


Why the Case Has Drawn So Much Attention

Camila’s disappearance has drawn significant local and national concern because:

  • It occurred on a holiday morning,

  • She left behind essential personal items, and

  • There are very few confirmed clues about her destination. 

The dashcam footage represents a rare time anchor in an otherwise puzzling case — a potential key to understanding what came next.


 Ongoing Search as Community Holds Hope

The disappearance of Camila Mendoza Olmos remains a deeply unsettling mystery. With dashcam footage possibly capturing her last confirmed sighting, authorities and loved ones are intensifying efforts to locate her and determine what happened after she left home that Christmas Eve morning.

As the investigation expands — with federal aid, community volunteers, and surveillance cooperation — every piece of footage and every tip could help bring resolution to her family during this harrowing time. If you have any information, the Bexar County Sheriff’s Office urges you to contact them immediately.




Anti-Iran Regime Protests Grow Across Country as Trump Administration Boosts Demonstrators’ Morale

 




Nationwide Unrest in Iran Meets U.S. Support

Anti-regime protests in Iran have expanded across major cities and towns, driven by deepening economic hardship, widespread discontent with government policies, and the sharp decline of the Iranian currency. As protesters continue to take to the streets — sometimes clashing with security forces — the Trump administration has publicly expressed support for the demonstrators, urging the Iranian government to respect their rights and urging a peaceful resolution to the unrest. 


What Triggered the Protests

The current wave of demonstrations was triggered by a historic plunge in the Iranian rial, which has severely reduced purchasing power and worsened inflation — with food prices reportedly soaring and living costs skyrocketing. 

Protesters, including bazaar merchants, shopkeepers, students, and ordinary citizens across Tehran, Isfahan, Mashhad, and more, have taken part in strikes, marches, and rallies. Slogans such as “death to the dictator” and “we want change” have been widely reported — signaling public frustration not only with economic decline but also with long-standing political grievances.

The unrest has been described as the largest anti-government protest movement in Iran in years, reflecting frustrations not only over living conditions but also broad discontent with the regime’s handling of internal issues and international tensions. 


Government Response and Clashes

Iranian authorities have responded with a mix of force and limited concessions. There have been reports of security forces using tear gas, heavy deployments in city centers, and clashes with demonstrators. Mobile phone traders and shopkeepers near Tehran’s Grand Bazaar were among the early groups to participate in strikes and demonstrations, illustrating how economic pressure has become a central mobilizing force. 

In some instances, protesters have been met with live fire and tear gas, and the government has taken measures to restrict social media access, including platforms like Telegram and Instagram, in an apparent effort to disrupt protest coordination and information sharing. 

Despite these crackdowns, protests have persisted for consecutive days and reportedly expanded to regions including Qeshm Island, Zanjan, Hamadan, and more, illustrating the nationwide scope of discontent. 


Trump Administration’s Public Support

Amid the unrest, former President Donald Trump and officials aligned with his administration have publicly expressed support for the Iranian demonstrators. Trump himself noted that the U.S. “stands with Iranians in the streets” and underscored that “the people of Iran want freedom,” signaling moral support for those protesting against the regime’s leadership. 

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz also underscored American support on social media, emphasizing that Washington backs Iranians’ rights to peaceful protest and calls on the regime to respect fundamental freedoms rather than suppress dissent. 

The official U.S. Persian-language account (@USAbehFarsi) reiterated these messages, directly addressing the Iranian people in their language and encouraging the Islamic Republic to respect protesters’ rights. 


Why the U.S. Support Matters

The Trump administration’s vocal backing of Iranian demonstrators marks a continuation of broader American policy aimed at increasing pressure on Tehran — both diplomatically and economically. This includes past sanctions, rhetoric around human rights, and opposition to perceived abuses by the Iranian government. Public support from U.S. officials can offer moral support to protesters and draw international attention to their cause. 

However, the extent of U.S. influence on domestic Iranian protests remains debated. While protesters have expressed some appreciation for international backing, many emphasize that real change must come from within Iran — rooted in local organizing, community mobilization, and sustained civic pressure rather than external interference. 



Red roses adorn nooses exhibited at the Anglo-Iranian community rally to back the Iranian people's call for a new revolution. Members of the Anglo-Iranian community, together with advocates of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), marked the 45th anniversary of the revolution in Iran that resulted in the removal of the Shah's regime and ultimately gave rise to a theocratic Islamic republic in 1979. (Loredana Sangiuliano/SOPA Images/LightRocket through Getty Images)


Iranian Government’s Reaction

Iranian officials have acknowledged the protests and, in some instances, reiterated their commitment to maintaining order. President **Masoud Pezeshkian’s government reportedly instructed ministers to engage with protest leaders and address their “legitimate demands,” signaling a willingness to open communication channels amid the unrest. 

Despite these gestures, other parts of the regime have been more confrontational, and state media has sometimes portrayed international expressions of support — including from the U.S. — as foreign interference rather than genuine solidarity with the Iranian people. 

Economic and Political Context

The backdrop of these protests goes beyond immediate price shocks. Iran’s long-term economic challenges — including sanctions, a volatile currency, reduced oil revenues, and domestic economic mismanagement — have contributed to decades of frustration among many citizens. 

Public dissent has also been fueled by continuing tensions with Western nations, especially over nuclear negotiations and regional conflicts involving Israel and the U.S. These broader geopolitical pressures add another layer of complexity to the protests and the regime’s responses. 


Looking Ahead: Protest Momentum and International Attention

The durability and growth of anti-government protests in Iran suggest that public dissatisfaction is broad and deep. The participation of diverse societal groups — from merchants and shopkeepers to students and workers — signals that the discontent is not limited to a single demographic. 

As demonstrations continue, international attention — including backing from global political figures — may shape how the movement evolves. At the same time, analysts caution that systemic change inside Iran will require sustained effort from within, and external gestures of support, while symbolically significant, may not by themselves lead to immediate political transformation. 


A Nation at a Crossroads

Anti-regime protests in Iran are spreading widely amid economic collapse and rising frustration with long-standing political and social grievances. As the Trump administration publicly supports the demonstrators and urges the Iranian government to respect their rights, the situation reflects a complex interplay between internal dissent and international geopolitics.

Iran now faces a critical moment where the outcome of these protests, and how both domestic leaders and foreign governments respond, could have lasting implications for the country’s future stability, governance, and its relations with the global community. 




Tributes Pour In for Civil Rights Activist Rev. Jesse Jackson: A Legacy That Reshaped American Politics

  Tributes are pouring in from political leaders, clergy members, activists, and everyday Americans honoring the life and legacy of Jesse Ja...